Ambrose Kettleby sold securities to Wilhelmina Radcote in a transaction that violated the Uniform Securities Act, and Wilhelmina commenced a civil action within the statutory period. While the action is pending, Ambrose dies. His estate argues that the claim died with him, and separately contends that had Wilhelmina died first, her claim would likewise have been extinguished. Under the Uniform Securities Act, what happens to the cause of action?
- A.It is extinguished, because civil liability under the Act is personal to the seller and ends at death.The Act expressly provides that the cause of action survives the death of a person who might have been a defendant.
- B.It survives only if Wilhelmina had already obtained a judgment before Ambrose died.Survival does not depend on a judgment having been entered. The pending action continues against the estate.
- C.It survives against the estate, but the estate's liability is capped at the amount of the securities' original purchase price.The Act contains no such cap. The ordinary measure of recovery applies against the estate.
- D.It survives, because every cause of action under the Act survives the death of any person who might have been a plaintiff or defendant.Correct. The survival provision operates symmetrically, so neither party's death defeats the claim.
Why: It survives. The Act provides that every cause of action under its civil liability provisions SURVIVES THE DEATH of any person who might have been a plaintiff or a defendant. The rule cuts both ways, which is why the estate's second contention fails as well: a buyer's claim passes to her estate if she dies, and a seller's liability passes to his estate if he dies. Without such a provision, liability could be extinguished by the death of a wrongdoer and a defrauded investor's recovery could be lost by her own death mid-litigation, so the survival provision keeps the remedy attached to the transaction rather than to the continued life of the parties. Wilhelmina may therefore proceed against Ambrose's estate.