Original questions written against the published FINRA and NASAA exam content outlines — not actual exam questions. Every choice is explained.
Which document is used in a private placement to describe the offering terms, the issuer's business and the risks of the investment to prospective private investors?
- A.The private placement memorandum (PPM)Correct. The PPM is the core offering document used in a private placement.
- B.A registered prospectusWrong. A prospectus is used in a registered public offering, not a private placement.
- C.A Schedule 13DWrong. Schedule 13D discloses beneficial ownership positions, not offering terms to prospective investors.
- D.A Form 8-KWrong. Form 8-K reports current material events for a reporting issuer, not private placement offering terms.
Why: The private placement memorandum (PPM) is the core offering document in a private placement, serving a role broadly analogous to a prospectus in a registered public offering, alongside items like the teaser and security term sheets.
Which of these is the placement agent responsible for distributing in a private placement?
- A.A statutory prospectus meeting the requirements of Section 10 of the Securities Act.Wrong. No prospectus exists in an unregistered offering.
- B.The securities certificates, which the agent issues to purchasers on closing.Wrong. The issuer or its transfer agent issues the securities, not the placement agent.
- C.The private placement memorandum and other offering material, together with the subscription documents.Correct. Distributing the offering material and collecting subscriptions is the agent function.
- D.The issuer securityholder register, which the agent maintains after closing.Wrong. Maintaining the register is an issuer or transfer agent function.
Why: The placement agent typically distributes the private placement memorandum and any accompanying offering material to prospective purchasers, collects executed subscription documents, and transmits investor funds according to the offering structure. It does not prepare or deliver a statutory prospectus, because the offering is not registered and no prospectus exists. It also does not issue the securities or maintain the issuer securityholder records, which are the issuer functions performed by the issuer or its transfer agent. Understanding which document belongs to which party is the practical core of the agent role.
An issuer distributes its private placement memorandum and subscription documents solely through a password-protected online portal, and grants portal access to any visitor who checks a box self-declaring accredited investor status, with no further screening. A broker-dealer acts as placement agent for the offering and relies on the portal's screening as sufficient to support its own reasonable-basis obligations regarding investor eligibility for a general-solicitation exemption. Is the placement agent's reliance appropriate?
- A.Yes — electronic self-certification satisfies the verification standard as long as it is documented and time-stampedWrong. Documentation and time-stamping do not cure the underlying lack of substantive verification.
- B.No, but only because password-protected portals are inherently prohibited for private placementsWrong. Portals are not inherently prohibited; the deficiency is the lack of any real screening step, not the use of a portal.
- C.Yes — responsibility for verifying investors rests solely with the issuer, not the placement agentWrong. The placement agent has its own verification obligations and cannot fully offload them onto the issuer's portal design.
- D.No — a self-declaration checkbox with no further screening does not constitute the reasonable steps to verify accredited status the exemption requiresCorrect. This is exactly the kind of unverified representation the reasonable-steps standard is meant to go beyond.
Why: No. A self-declaration checkbox with no further screening does not constitute the reasonable steps to verify accredited status that a general-solicitation exemption requires, and the placement agent cannot treat the portal's minimal gate as satisfying its own verification obligation. The placement agent has its own duty here; it cannot fully offload that duty onto whatever screening mechanism the issuer happened to build into its portal.