An investor submits a mutual fund purchase order at 5:15 pm ET, after the fund's 4:00 pm pricing time. Executing that order at the 4:00 pm NAV computed earlier the same day would be:
- A.Permissible because the order was placed on the same calendar dayWrong. The pricing cutoff, not the calendar day, controls which NAV applies.
- B.Illegal late trading; the order must receive the next business day's NAVCorrect. Pricing an after-cutoff order at the earlier NAV violates forward pricing.
- C.Required, because customers always get the most recent computed priceWrong. Customers get the NEXT computed price, never the most recent one.
- D.Permissible if the customer pays an extra service feeWrong. No fee can legitimize late trading.
Why: An order received after the pricing time must be executed at the next computed NAV, the following business day's price. Filling it at the already-struck price is late trading, a fraudulent practice. Citation: SEC Rule 22c-1; SEC late-trading enforcement actions. Takeaway: after the cutoff, the order gets tomorrow's NAV.
Verrall Capital, a hedge fund, has an arrangement with a broker-dealer permitting it to submit mutual fund orders as late as 6:00 p.m. Eastern and still receive that day 4:00 p.m. net asset value, after the evening news is known. A different investor trades in and out of an international fund frequently but always submits orders before the 4:00 p.m. cut-off. Which statement is correct?
- A.Both practices violate Rule 22c-1, since both are attempts to profit at the expense of long-term shareholdersOrders placed before the cut-off are priced correctly under Rule 22c-1. Motive does not make a properly priced order a pricing violation.
- B.Both practices are permissible provided the fund discloses them in its prospectusNo disclosure can authorise pricing an order at a net asset value computed before the order was received.
- C.Late trading is permitted for institutional investors, whose orders are negotiated rather than retailRule 22c-1 draws no line between institutional and retail orders. Both must receive the next computed price.
- D.The 6:00 p.m. arrangement is late trading and violates the forward pricing rule; the pre-cut-off frequent trading is market timing, which the fund may restrict through its disclosed policiesCorrect. Late trading breaks Rule 22c-1 and defrauds other shareholders. Market timing is addressed by fund policy, exchange limits, redemption fees and Rule 22c-2 agreements.
Why: The 6:00 p.m. arrangement is late trading. Rule 22c-1 requires that an order receive the next net asset value computed after the order is received, so pricing a 6:00 p.m. order at the 4:00 p.m. figure hands the trader a free look at post-close information at the expense of every other shareholder. It is a violation and, given the concealment involved, a fraud. Frequent trading placed before the cut-off is market timing: not itself unlawful, but disruptive, and funds may and do restrict it through disclosed frequent trading policies, exchange limits, short-term redemption fees and Rule 22c-2 information agreements.