Original questions written against the published FINRA and NASAA exam content outlines — not actual exam questions. Every choice is explained.
Brightwater Robotics is raising capital through a best efforts offering. The agreement provides that the deal closes only if at least 2,000,000 dollars of securities are sold, but permits the underwriter to sell as much as 5,000,000 dollars if demand supports it. This structure is a:
- A.A mini-max offering.Correct. A floor that must be reached plus a ceiling that may not be exceeded is the defining shape of a mini-max.
- B.A firm commitment offering.Wrong. In a firm commitment the syndicate buys the whole issue and bears resale risk. The stem describes a best efforts arrangement.
- C.A standby offering.Wrong. A standby arrangement is used in a rights offering, where the bank agrees to buy shares existing holders decline to subscribe for.
- D.An all-or-none offering.Wrong. All-or-none has a single threshold - the entire issue must sell or the deal is cancelled. There is no partial-close band.
Why: A MINI-MAX offering is a best efforts arrangement with both a floor and a ceiling: a minimum that must be reached for the offering to close and a maximum beyond which no more may be sold. Contrast an ALL-OR-NONE offering, which has only a single threshold - the entire issue must be sold or the whole deal is cancelled. Both are contingency offerings, so investor funds collected before the contingency is met must be held in escrow at an independent bank under SEC Rule 15c2-4 and returned if the contingency fails.
Sedbury Alloys is registering a $6 million offering in State W by qualification. Eleven months before the filing, its two founders bought 900,000 shares from the company for $0.02 a share; the public offering price will be $9.00. The Administrator is concerned that the founders could sell into the public market immediately after effectiveness. Under the Uniform Securities Act, the Administrator may:
- A.Refuse the registration outright, because an offering price 450 times the founders' cost is unfair on its faceDisparity in price is what the escrow condition manages. It is not itself a statutory ground for refusing to register.
- B.Require as a condition of registration that the founders' shares be deposited in escrow, since they were issued to promoters within the past three years for a consideration substantially different from the public offering priceCorrect. The escrow condition exists for promoter shares issued cheaply within the three-year look-back.
- C.Require as a condition of registration that the offering proceeds be impounded until the founders' shares are soldImpounding is a real condition, but it holds the offering proceeds until the issuer raises a specified amount. It does nothing about the founders' shares.
- D.Require the founders to register as agents of the issuer before the registration becomes effectiveAgent registration turns on soliciting purchases for the issuer, which is a separate question from what happens to the founders' own shares.
Why: The Act lets the Administrator attach conditions to a registration by qualification or coordination. One of them addresses exactly this situation: securities issued within the past three years, or to be issued, to a promoter for a consideration substantially different from the public offering price, or to any person for a consideration other than cash, may be required to be deposited in escrow. A separate condition allows the Administrator to require that the proceeds of the offering be impounded until the issuer receives a specified amount. Both are conditions of registration rather than grounds to refuse it outright.
In a speculative offering registered by QUALIFICATION, the Administrator is concerned that investors' money could vanish before the venture is funded. As conditions of registration, the Administrator may properly require:
- A.A personal guarantee of investor returns from the issuer's officersNo provision lets the Administrator mandate performance guarantees; regulators police disclosure and process, not investment outcomes.
- B.That only residents with net worth above $1 million purchaseInvestor wealth floors are a feature of federal accredited-investor rules, not conditions the Administrator may attach to a qualification registration.
- C.That the offering be underwritten on a firm-commitment basisThe Act does not empower the Administrator to dictate the underwriting method chosen by the issuer.
- D.Escrow of promoters' cheap stock and impoundment of proceeds until a specified amount is raisedCorrect. Both escrow of promotional shares and impoundment of proceeds are express conditions available to the Administrator, along with prescribed subscription forms.
Why: The Administrator may require that promoters' securities issued for less than the offering price be escrowed, and that offering proceeds be impounded until the issuer receives a specified amount, and may require use of a prescribed subscription form. Review: Conditions on securities registration.
Thackery Cider Works files a registration by qualification in State J for a $4 million offering, stating that it needs at least $2 million to execute its business plan. The Administrator proposes to condition effectiveness on the deposit of all offering proceeds into an escrow account until $2 million has been raised, with funds returned to subscribers if the minimum is not met. Under the Uniform Securities Act, this condition is:
- A.Available only if the issuer consents in writing to the escrow arrangementThe condition may be imposed by rule or order. Issuer consent is not a prerequisite.
- B.Within the Administrator's authority, because impounding proceeds may be imposed as a condition of registrationCorrect. The Act expressly permits an escrow or impound condition until a specified minimum is raised.
- C.Beyond the Administrator's authority, because conditions on the use of proceeds interfere with the issuer's businessThe Act grants this power explicitly, and it operates as a condition of registration rather than management of the business.
- D.Available only for offerings of federal covered securities registered with the SECThis inverts the rule. Federal covered securities are the offerings a state may NOT condition in this way.
Why: The Act authorizes the Administrator, by rule or order, to require as a condition of registration that the proceeds of an offering be impounded or escrowed until the issuer receives a specified amount. The power exists precisely for offerings like this one, where the issuer's plan fails unless a minimum is raised, so that early subscribers are not left funding a venture that never becomes viable. The Administrator may also require that securities be sold only on a specified form of subscription.
7 questions in our bank involve Impoundment Of Proceeds. Practise them with instant explanations.