Independent exam preparation · Original questions, every answer explained Reviews
Finance Exam Pro

Dry Hole

Appears in our practice questions for: Series 22

A well that fails to produce commercial quantities of oil or gas. Which party bears the cost of dry holes is a defined term of the program sharing arrangement, not a matter of custom.

Practice questions using Dry Hole

Original questions written against the published FINRA and NASAA exam content outlines — not actual exam questions. Every choice is explained.

A limited partner in an oil and gas drilling program is told that his units represent a working interest. What obligation does that description carry?

  1. A.An obligation to accept unlimited personal liability for the program's debtsWrong. Unlimited liability follows from general partner status, not from the type of interest held.
  2. B.An obligation to buy further units if a well has to be deepened or reworkedWrong. Mandatory assessments are a term of a particular program rather than an attribute of the interest.
  3. C.An obligation to bear a share of program costs, including the wells that failCorrect. Cost sharing is the defining burden that comes attached to the revenue share.
  4. D.An obligation to market his share of production through the operator at posted pricesWrong. Marketing arrangements are contractual and are not what the term denotes.

Why: The outline defines a working interest as an interest in production revenues in which the partners share program costs. Revenue and cost travel together in this interest: the holder funds drilling, completion and operating expenses in proportion to the interest held and receives production revenue in the same proportion. A dry hole is a cost like any other, so a working interest holder pays for the wells that fail as well as the wells that produce. The two cost-free interests, the override and the reversionary working interest, are defined precisely by the absence of this obligation.

A sponsor will drill wells inside the boundaries of a field with known producing reserves, offsetting wells that are already flowing. The offering document calls the program exploratory. What is it in substance?

  1. A.Exploratory, because any newly drilled bore may still fail to produceWrong. A chance of failure exists in all drilling and is not the dividing line between the two types.
  2. B.An income program, because the surrounding wells in the field are already producingWrong. An income program acquires existing production; this one spends its capital drilling.
  3. C.A royalty program, because the wells sit within a field that is already under leaseWrong. A royalty describes how revenue is shared, not what the program does with investor capital.
  4. D.A development program, because it drills into reserves that have already been provenCorrect. Proven nearby production is exactly what moves drilling out of the exploratory category.

Why: The three drilling and production categories in the outline are separated by what the capital is exposed to. An exploratory program drills where the presence of hydrocarbons is unproven, an income program buys production that already exists, and a development program drills into reserves that have been proven by nearby production. Here the capital funds new bores into a known structure, which is development drilling and carries the outline's development profile: an up-front tax benefit, return potential from reserves, and fewer dry holes than exploratory. Had the sponsor been drilling a structure with no producing wells nearby, the exploratory label would fit.

A representative tells a customer that a development oil and gas program carries no dry-hole risk because it drills next to proven reserves. What is wrong with that statement?

  1. A.Development programs drill only where reserves have already been produced, so the term is inapplicableWrong. A development program still drills new wells; it simply drills them into a proven structure.
  2. B.Development drilling reduces the frequency of dry holes but does not eliminate themCorrect. The outline separates the two drilling types by how often wells fail, not by whether they can.
  3. C.Nothing is wrong, since the only remaining risk in such a program is the commodity priceWrong. Price risk is real but it is not the sole risk, and a well can still come up empty.
  4. D.Development programs shift dry-hole costs to the sponsor as a matter of lawWrong. Who funds a dry hole is a term of the program's sharing arrangement, not a legal default.

Why: The outline distinguishes exploratory from development drilling by the frequency of failure, not by its absence: a development program has fewer dry holes than an exploratory program, and both list dry holes among their risks. Drilling into a proven structure raises the probability that a bore encounters producible hydrocarbons, but the geology at each new location is still inferred rather than observed. A representative may fairly say the odds are better; saying the risk is gone misdescribes the product. The statement would only become accurate for a program that buys wells already producing, which does no drilling at all.

A program acquires interests in wells that are already producing and will drill nothing. Which risk moves to the front of an investor's analysis compared with a drilling program?

  1. A.The chance that the first wells the program drills turn out to be dry holesWrong. The program buys production that already exists, so there is no wildcat outcome pending.
  2. B.The chance that intangible drilling costs are disallowed as deductions to the partnersWrong. This invents a disallowance and points at costs a non-drilling program barely incurs.
  3. C.The chance that long-term financing cannot be arranged to fund the acquisitionWrong. Take-out financing risk belongs to real estate development in this outline, not here.
  4. D.The chance that the reserves remaining in the acquired wells have been overestimatedCorrect. The engineering estimate is what the purchase price and the projected distributions both rest on.

Why: An income program has already resolved the question a drilling program exists to answer, because the hydrocarbons are demonstrably there and flowing. What remains uncertain is how much is left and what it will fetch, which is why the outline names overestimation of reserves and commodity pricing as the risks of an income program. A reserve estimate is an engineering opinion about rock that nobody can see, and an overstated one inflates both the price the program paid and the distributions investors were led to expect. Add a drilling component to the same program and dry holes return to the top of the list.

6 questions in our bank involve Dry Hole. Practise them with instant explanations.

Related terms

Finance Exam Pro is not affiliated with FINRA, NASAA, or any exam sponsor. Practice questions are original and are not actual exam questions. Rules change — confirm current requirements with the relevant regulator.